Obliteration of Dentinal Tubules by Desensitizing Agents Based on Silver Fluoride/Potassium Iodide or Pre-Reacted Glass Particles: An in Vitro Study

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of desensitizing agents for the obliteration of dentinal tubules subjected or not to a simulated oral environment. Material and Methods: Dentinal discs (n=8) treated with Riva-Star (RS) or PRG-Barrier-Coat (PRG) were submitted (cycled) or not submitted (control) to erosive-abrasive-thermal cycles and evaluated using scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopic analysis. The variables analyzed were tubule obliteration and dentin surface chemical composition. Data were analyzed by non-parametric tests (p<0.05). Results: The cycled and control groups did not differ significantly for the responses in each material. The PRG control and cycled groups had fewer visible tubules and a higher proportion of totally obliterated tubules than the RS groups. The percentages of silver coverage were higher in the RS-control than in the RS-cycled. There was a significant inverse correlation between the presence of silver and non-obliterated tubules (R=-0.791; p<0.001). The percentages of carbon, aluminum, strontium, and potassium were significantly higher in the PRG-control and PRG-cycled compared to the RS control. The percentages of calcium, phosphorus, and silver were significantly higher in the RS compared to the PRG groups. PRG-control showed a higher percentage of boron than RS-control. Conclusion: PRG promoted greater tubule obliteration than SR. Simulated stress did not affect the obliterating effect of each agent. Greater silver coverage corresponded to a lower proportion of non-obliterated tubules in RS. Carbon, aluminum, strontium, boron, and potassium predominated in the dentin surface treated with PRG, while calcium, phosphorus, and silver prevailed in RS groups (AU).

Hipersensibilidade dentinária: etiologia, diagnóstico e tratamento / Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment

Introdução: A hipersensibilidade dentinária (HD) consiste em uma condição clínica caracterizada por dor localizada, curta e aguda, resultante de estímulos exógenos. Objetivo: Esse estudo objetivou realizar uma revisão da literatura sobre os aspectos relevantes vinculados à HD, como etiologia, diagnóstico, mecanismos biológicos, medidas preventivas e terapêuticas. Metodologia: Foi realizada a busca eletrônica de publicações nas bases de dados Scielo, PubMed, Periódicos Capes, Lilacs e Medline, utilizando os seguintes descritores: "dentin", "dentin sensitivy", "treatment". Os estudos foram publicados no período de 2010 a 2020. Resultados: Observou-se que a HD acomete cerca de 9-55% da população, principalmente indivíduos entre a terceira e quarta décadas de vida, apresentando maior prevalência no sexo feminino, afetando especialmente as regiões vestibulares dos caninos, pré-molares superiores e sequencialmente os incisivos e molares inferiores. O diagnóstico é determinado a partir de testes de sensibilidade, como o mecânico ou a desidratação. O tratamento dispõe de inúmeras propostas baseadas na obliteração dos túbulos dentinários como forma de impossibilitar a movimentação líquida intratubular ou restrição neural dos mecanorreceptores pulpares. Conclusão: Embora os aspectos clínicos sejam bem estabelecidos na literatura, a importância de um correto diagnóstico é essencial para um plano de tratamento adequado, por se tratar de uma condição de etiologia multifatorial... (AU)

Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) consists of a clinical condition characterized by localized, hort and acute pain, resulting from exogenous stimulus. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a narrative literature review on the relevant aspects linked to DH, such as etiology, diagnosis, biological mechanisms, preventive and therapeutic approaches. Methodology: The electronic search for publications was carried out in the Scielo, PubMed, Capes, Lilacs and Medline databases, using the following descriptors: "dentin", "dentin sensitivy", "treatment". The studies were published in the period from 2010 to 2020. Results: It was observed that DH affects about 9-55% of the population, mainly belonging to the third and fourth decade of life, with higher prevalence in females, especially affecting the vestibular regions of the canines, upper premolars and sequentially the incisors and molars lower. The diagnosis is determined based on sensitivity tests, such as mechanical or dehydration. The treatment has numerous proposals based on the obliteration of the dentinal tubules as a way of preventing the intratubular liquid movement or neural restriction of the pulp mechanoreceptors. Conclusion: Although the clinical aspects are well established in the literature, the importance of a correct diagnosis is essential for an adequate treatment plan, as it is a multifactorial condition... (AU)

Eficacia de la arginina al 8% y nitrato potásico al 5% en el tratamiento de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria: ensayo clínico aleatorio / Efficacy of 8% arginine and 5% potassium nitrate in dentin hypersensitivity therapy: a randomized clinical trial

RESUMEN: Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia clínica de dentífricos en base a arginina al 8%/ monofluorfosfato de sodio 1450 ppm versus nitrato de potasio al 5%/fluoruro de sodio 2500 ppm en la terapia de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria (HSD). Materiales y método: Ensayo clínico, aleatorio, controlado, doble ciego, de grupos paralelos. Treinta y cuatro voluntarios de 18 a 70 años, con HSD en escala Visual Análoga (EVA) ≥4 en 2 ó más dientes no molares, fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en 2 grupos: grupo T1 (n=16): dentífrico de Arginina al 8%/ monofluorfosfato de sodio 1450 ppm; y grupo T2 (n=18): dentífrico de nitrato de Potasio al 5%/fluoruro de sodio 2500 ppm. Se evaluó HSD en EVA con estímulos evaporativos y térmicos, y se compararon sus valores, así como el grado promedio de HSD y su reducción (∆HSD), intra e intergrupal, al inicio y a las 4 semanas de tratamiento. Resultados: Ambos dentífricos disminuyeron el grado promedio de HSD entre el inicio y las 4 semanas de tratamiento (T1: 5.03 ± 1.23 versus 2.60 ± 1.27, p<0.05; T2: 4.73 ± 1.51 versus 2.71 ± 1.17, p<0.05). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos dentífricos al comparar el grado promedio de reducción de HSD durante la terapia (∆HSD T1: -2.43 ± 1.22 versus ∆HSD T2: -2.27 ± 1.42). Los datos fueron analizados en Stata versión 11. Conclusiones: Ambos dentífricos fueron clínicamente eficaces en reducir la HSD a las 4 semanas, sin existir diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos.

ABSTRACT: Aim: To compare the clinical efficacy of 8% arginine/1450ppm sodium monofluorophosphate and 5% potassium nitrate/2500 ppm sodium fluoride dentifrices in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). Methods: Parallel-design, double-masked, randomized controlled clinical trial. Thirty four volunteers aged 18 to 70 years, with DH and a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥4 at least in two or more non-molar teeth, were randomized in two groups: T1 (n=16): 8% arginine/1450 ppm sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice; and T2 (n=18): 5% potassium nitrate/2500 ppm sodium fluoride dentifrice. DH was assessed with evaporative and thermal stimuli; and their VAS measurements, mean DH value and DH reduction (∆DH) were compared, inside and between the groups at baseline and 4-week follow-up. Data were analysed through Stata® V11 program. Results: Both toothpastes decreased mean DH value between baseline and 4 weeks (T1: 5.03 ± 1.23 versus 2.60 ± 1.27, p<0.05; T2: 4.73 ± 1.51 versus 2.71 ± 1.17, p<0.05). There were no statistical differences between both dentifrices in mean DH reduction values during therapy (∆HSD T1: -2.43 ± 1.22 versus ∆HSD T2:-2.27 ± 1.42). Conclusions: Both dentifrices had clinical efficacy in decreasing DH in a 4- week therapy, without statistical differences between both of them.

Evaluación clínica de barniz de flúor en el manejo de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria / Clinical evaluation fluoride varnish in the management of dentin hypersensitivity

La Hipersensibilidad Dentinaria (HD) se define como un corto y fuerte dolor generado por la exposición de dentina, que surge de un estímulo químico, térmico, táctil u osmótico, el cual no puede catalogarse como una patología dental propiamente tal. La teoría hidrodinámica de Brännström es la más aceptada en la actualidad para explicar la etiopatogenia de esta afección. Muchos productos han sido elaborados con el fin de combatir la HD, pero no todos constan de la efectividad deseada para atenuarla. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la efectividad inmediata y mediata (posterior a 2 semanas), de un barniz de flúor (Flúor Protector®) utilizado en la problemática. El estudio es un ensayo clínico no controlado. La muestra consistió de 30 pacientes, sin distinción de género, de entre 20 a 60 años, atendidos en las clínicas de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Andrés Bello, cuyo diagnóstico fue HD, en al menos un diente, con recesión gingival de al menos 2 mm, la cual presento dentina expuesta desde la unión amelocementaria, y además que respondieron a 3 o más puntos en la Escala Numérica (EN), cuando fue aplicado el estímulo evaporativo. Los datos fueron recogidos, en una ficha diseñada para el estudio, la cual incluyo datos del paciente y 9 EN, con las cuales se cuantifico la percepción de dolor de los pacientes frente a 3 estímulos: evaporativo, táctil y térmico. Estadísticamente se utilizó análisis de tipo descriptivo y de varianza de Friedman. Se obtuvieron resultados estadísticamente significativos (p<0.05) en la disminución casi completa de la HD frente al tratamiento inmediato (mediana< 3), además de la mantenida reducción de la misma en el control posterior a 2 semanas de aplicada la terapia. En conclusión, la terapia con flúor barniz es efectiva en el tratamiento inmediato y mediato de la HD.

Dentin Hypersensitivity (DH) is defined as a short, sharp pain generated by exposure of dentin, which arises from a chemical stimuli, thermal, tactile or osmotic, which can't be categorized as a dental pathology as such. Brännström hydrodynamic theory is widely accepted today to explain the pathogenesis of this condition. Many products have been developed to combat DH, but not all consist of the desired effectiveness to attenuate. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness immediate and mediate (after two weeks), a fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector), used in the management of patients with this problem. The present study is an uncontrolled clinical trial. The sample consisted of 30 patients, regardless of gender, aged 20 to 60, treated at the clinics of the Faculty of Dentistry at the "Universidad Andres Bello", whose diagnosis was DH, in a least one tooth with gingival recession at least 2 mm, which exposed dentin present from the CEJ, and also responding to three of more points on the Numeric Scale (NS), when the stimulus was applied evaporative. Data were collected after approval and written informed consent, in a form designed for the study, which included data from the patient and 9 NS, which was quantified with pain perception of patients versus 3 stimuli: evaporative, touch and heat. For statistical analysis we used descriptive analysis and variance of Friedman. Regarding the 3 stimuli under study results were statistically significant (p< 0.05) decrease in the almost complete DH versus immediate treatment (median < 3), besides the maintained reduction thereof in the inspection after 2 weeks of therapy applied. In conclusion, treatment with fluoride varnish is effective in treating the immediate and mediate DH.

Avaliação in vitro de novos produtos na diminuição da permeabilidade dentinária antes e após desafios ácidos / In vitro evaluation of new products in regarding dentin permeability reduction before and after acid challenge model

Objetivo: avaliar in vitro a efetividade de aplicações sucessivas de diferentes produtos utilizados para o tratamento da hipersensibilidade dentinária cervical na redução da permeabilidade dentinária, assim como avaliar a resistência destes produtos a desafios ácidos. Material e métodos: foram utilizados 72 terceiros molares humanos íntegros para a preparação de 72 amostras, que foram ligadas a um sistema de pressão hidráulica para mensurar a permeabilidade dentinária após os seguintes passos: 1) preparação da amostra; 2) tratamento com ácido fosfórico a 37% durante 30 segundos; 3) cinco aplicações dos produtos testados; 4) primeiro desafio ácido; 5) segundo desafio ácido; e 6) terceiro desafio ácido. As amostras foram divididas aleatoriamente em seis grupos (n=12), de acordo com os tratamentos propostos: Desensibilize Nano P, Clinpro XT, dentifrício Colgate Sensitive Pró-Alívio, dentifrício Duraphat, dentifrício Sensodyne Repair e após restauração com resina composta (grupo-controle). Conclusão: que todos os produtos testados foram capazes de promover a redução da permeabilidade dentinária significativamente, sendo que os grupos Clinpro XT, Desensibilize Nano P e controle mantiveram esses níveis reduzidos estatisticamente até o terceiro desafio ácido, enquanto que os dentifrícios Duraphat, Sensodyne Repair e Colgate Sensitive Pró-Alívio mantiveram essas reduções estatisticamente significativas até o segundo desafio ácido.

Objective: to evaluate in vitro the effectiveness of successive applications of different products used for the treatment of cervical dentinal hypersensitivity, reducing dentin permeability, as well as to evaluate the resistance of these products, acids challenges. Material and methods: 72 intact human third molars were used for the preparation of 72 samples were bound to a hydraulic pressure system to measure the dentin after the following steps: 1) sample preparation; 2) treatment with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds; 3) 5 applications of the products tested; 4) first challenge acid; 5) second challenge acid; 6) third challenge acid. The samples were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=12) according to the proposed treatments: Desensibilize Nano P, Clinpro XT, toothpaste Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief, Duraphat toothpaste, toothpaste Sensodyne Repair and after restoration with composite resin (control group). Conclusion: all products tested were able to significantly promote the reduction of dentin, and the Clinpro XT groups Desensibilize Nano P and control these reduced levels remained statistically to the third challenge acid, while toothpaste Duraphat, Sensodyne Repair and Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief kept these statistically significant reductions to the second challenge acid.

Influence of prolonged use of desensitizing dentifrices on dentin bond strength of self-etching adhesive system / Influencia del uso prolongado de pasta dentífrica desensibilizante en la fuerza de unión de la dentina de un sistema adhesivo autocondicionante

Dentin hypersensitivity is a relatively common clinical condition, which affects a large part of the world's population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of previous and prolonged treatment with desensitizing dentifrices (DD) on bond strength to dentin, promoted by a self-etching adhesive system. Seventy non-carious bovine incisors were used, and divided into five groups (n= 14), according to the desensitizing toothpaste used, such as, G1: distilled water (WATER) (control); G2: Colgate Total 12 (CT12) (control); G3: Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief (CSPR); G4: Sensodyne Rapid Relief (SRR); G5: Sensodyne Repair & Protect (SRP). Teeth had their buccal surfaces flattened until the exposure of dentin, and fragments of 4x4x2 mm were obtained. Fragments were included in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cylinders and exposed to 17 % EDTA for 1 min. Subsequently, specimens were submitted to 20 000 cycles of simulated dental toothbrushing. After 24 h in artificial saliva, specimens were hybridized (Clearfil SE Bond ­ Kuraray), as well as resin composite cylinders built on dentin surfaces. Samples were stored in distilled water, at 37 C for 24 h, and the shear bond strength was determined. The highest bond strength (MPa) value was seen in CT12 group (4.39), and the lowest one in CSPR group (3.34). Data were statistically analyzed by 1-way ANOVA (ð= 0.05), and results showed that there were no significant differences (p= 0.5986) considering the DD factor. The predominant fracture pattern was cohesive on dentin. The previous and prolonged use of different DD did not affect dentin bond strength promoted by a self-etching adhesive system.

La hipersensibilidad dentinaria es una condición clínica relativamente común, que afecta a una gran parte de la población mundial. El objetivo fue evaluar la influencia del tratamiento previo y prolongado con dentífricos desensibilizantes (DD) en fuerza de adhesión a la dentina, que promueve un sistema adhesivo de autograbado. Se utilizaron 70 incisivos bovinos no cariados, y se dividieron en cinco grupos (n= 14), de acuerdo con la pasta de dientes desensibilizante utilizada: G1: agua destilada (agua) (control), G2: Colgate Total 12 (CT12) (control), G3: Colgate Sensitive Pro-Alivio (CSPR), G4: Sensodyne Rápido Alivio (SRR) y G5: Sensodyne Repair & Protect (SRP). Los dientes tenían sus superficies bucales aplanadas hasta la exposición de la dentina, y se obtuvieron fragmentos de 4x4x2 mm. Los fragmentos se incluyeron en cilindros de cloruro de polivinilo y se expusieron a 17 % de EDTA durante un 1 min. Después, las muestras se sometieron a 20 000 ciclos de cepillado dental simulado. Después de 24 h en saliva artificial, las muestras se hibridaron (Clearfil SE Bond - Kuraray), y cilindros de resina compuesta fueron construidos sobre superficies de dentina. Las muestras se almacenaron en agua destilada, a 37 °C durante 24 h y luego se determinó la resistencia al cizallamiento. El mayor valor de resistencia a la unión (MPa) se observó en el grupo CT12 (4,39), y el menor en el grupo CSPR (3,34). Los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente mediante ANOVA de un factor 1 (ð= 0,05), y los resultados no mostraron diferencias significativas (p= 0,5986) teniendo en cuenta el factor de los DD. El patrón de fractura predominante sobre la dentina fue el cohesivo. El uso previo y prolongado de diferente DD no afectó resistencia de unión a la dentina promovido por un sistema adhesivo de autograbado.

Effects of different desensitizing treatments on root dentin permeability

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of diode laser and a desensitizing dentifrice on dentin permeability. Fifty-two root dentin fragments were obtained (5 × 5mm) and treated with 24% EDTA gel. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 13): G1, control (no treatment); G2, diode laser (λ = 908 nm, 1.5 W, continuous mode, 20s); G3, application of abrasive dentifrice for 1 minute (Elmex Sensitive Professional (International Gaba); and G4, application of abrasive dentifrice for 1 minute followed by irradiation with diode laser. Ten samples per group were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 4h. The specimens were washed, longitudinally sectioned, observed under optical microscopy, photographed and assessed based on the degree of dye leakage. The remaining samples were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The leakage data were subjected to ANOVA test, followed by Tukey's t-test (α = 5%). Groups 2, 3 and 4 showed less dye penetration than the control group (p < 0.05), but were similar among each other. SEM images showed that dentinal tubules were open in G1, and fused and occluded in G2. Group 3 showed dentinal tubules that were occluded by the metal ions from the toothpaste. G4 presented similar characteristics to G3, and the presence of fused dentin. The diode laser and the dentifrice were effective in reducing dentinal permeability, and the combination of the two treatments did not show better results than either one used alone.

Evaluation of three different agents for in‑office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: A controlled clinical study.

Context: Dentin desensitizers are used for in‑office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. They block the open tubules and bring about a reduction in hypersensitivity. Aim: The aim was to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of a dentin desensitizer, a combination of a dentin desensitizer + adhesive and one‑bottle self‑etching adhesive for in‑office treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Settings and Design: Institutional, prospective double-blind parallel clinical design. Subjects and Methods: A total of 54 teeth in 20 patients were randomly allocated to one of the three study groups, with 18 teeth in each group as follows: Group A‑Gluma Desensitizer (GD), Group B‑Gluma Comfort Bond + Desensitizer (GCBD), Group C‑Single Bond Universal (SBU). The patients’ dentinal hypersensitivity scores for tactile (hand‑held scratch device), thermal (cold), and evaporative (dental unit air syringe) stimuli were recorded on a visual analog scale. The parameters were recorded at baseline, immediately after application of the agent, 3‑ and 6‑week posttreatment. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed with Friedman’s test, Wilcoxon signed ranks test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney‑U‑test (P < 0.05). Results: All three groups showed a significant reduction in dentinal hypersensitivity (P < 0.05) compared to baseline at all time intervals. Statistically, significant differences were noted between GD and SBU; between GCBD and SBU in all testing parameters. Between GD and GCBD no significant difference was noted. Conclusions: GD and GCBD showed a greater reduction in dentin hypersensitivity than SBU.

Dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions – a single-blind, split-mouth study

This study aims to compare the in vivo effect of a desensitizing therapy associated with a restorative technique for the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH) in non-carious lesions. The sample consisted of 68 teeth with moderate or severe dentin hypersensitivity in 17 individuals (one tooth per quadrant). The sensitivity levels of the teeth were scored, and the teeth were randomly distributed into four groups: T1 – desensitizing gel applied once per week until remission of pain; T2 – desensitizing gel applied once per week followed immediately by restoration with resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M Espe); T3 – desensitizing gel once per week until remission of pain and then restoration with resin composite; and T4 - restoration with resin composite. Dentin hypersensitivity was assessed at 0, 7, 30, 90 and 180 days. The Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney (p< 0.05) tests were used to compare the treatments. The mean baseline CDH scores were T1 - 2.41, T2 - 2.41, T3 - 2.47, and T4 - 2.70 (p > 0.05). At seven and 180 days, the mean CDH scores were as follows: T1 - 1.47/0.65, T2 - 1.35/0.71, T3 - 0.71/0.53, and T4 - 1.12/0.59, all of which were significantly lower (p< 0.001) than the baseline scores. The scores at 30, 90 and 180 days were not significantly different when compared to the score of the previous period. At 180 days, CDH scores were similar among groups (p> 0.05). Teeth with moderate or severe hypersensitivity that required a filling responded similarly regardless of whether the desensitizing procedure was carried out prior to the filling.

Efetividade de duas pastas dessensibilizantes no controle da hipersensibilidade dentinária em pacientes com recessão gengival / Effectiveness of two desensitizing pastes in the control of dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession

O objetivo desta investigação foi avaliar clinicamente em humanos a efetividade de duas pastas dessensibilizantes à base de cálcio no controle da hipersensibilidade dentinária em pacientes com recessão gengival. A pesquisa caracterizou-se como um estudo clínico, cuja população alvo foi composta por 27 pacientes da clínica de periodontia do curso de odontologia da UNIVALI, não incluindo indivíduos com desordens gerais ou dentais, que poderiam interferir no diagnóstico de hiperestesia dentinária como cárie, dentes trincados ou lascados, restaurações fraturadas, sensibilidade pós-restauração e dentes em hiperfunção. Foram avaliados 115 elementos dentais com hipersensibilidade grau 2 (moderada) e 3 (severa) os quais foram divididos em 2 Grupos. O Grupo I formado pelos dentes tratados com o dessensibilizante Colgate Sensitive Pró-Alívio (Colgate) e o Grupo II foi constituído pelos dentes tratados com o dessensibilizante Desensibilize Nano P (FGM). Todos os dentes examinados receberam 2 aplicações tópicas (1 por semana). Os produtos foram aplicados com taça de borracha em baixa velocidade e foram avaliados quanto à redução da hipersensibilidade imediatamente após a primeira aplicação, antes da segunda aplicação, imediatamente e 7 e 14 dias após a segunda aplicação. Os dados foram tabulados, submetidos à análise estatística e revelaram uma efetividade maior para o produto Colgate Sensitive Pró-Alívio logo após as aplicações, com uma diminuição de sua ação em longo prazo, já o produto Nano-p, obteve um menor efeito imediato comparado ao outro produto, no entanto, manteve seu nível de ação no controle da hipersensibilidade dentinária com o passar do tempo...

The objective of this investigation was to evaluate clinically the effectiveness of two desensitizing agents based on calcium in the control of dentinal hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession. The research was characterized as a clinical study, whose target population was composed of 27 patients of the clinic of periodontics of the dentistry course of UNIVALI, excluding individuals with general and dental disorders which could interfere in the diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity such as caries, cracked or chipped teeth, fractured restorations, sensitivity after restoration and hyperfunctional teeth. There were evaluated 115 dental elements with hypersensitivity grade 2 (mild) and 3 (severe) were divided into 2 groups. The Group I was formed by the teeth treated with desensitizing Colgate Pro-Relief (Colgate) and Group II was composed of teeth treated with desensitizing Desensitize Nano P (FGM). All examined teeth received two topical applications (1 per week). The products were applied with rubber cup at low speed and were evaluated according reduction of the hypersensitivity immediately after the first application, before the second application immediately and 7 and 14 days after second application. The data were tabulated, statistically analyzed and showed a greater effectiveness for the product Colgate Pro-Relief after applications, with a decrease of its action in the long run, but the product Nano-p, had a lesser action compared to the immediate effects of the other product, however, maintained its activity level to control dentinal hypersensitivity in the course of time...

The influence of desensitizing dentifrices on pain induced by in-office bleaching

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of desensitizing dentifrices used 15 days prior to and after in-office tooth bleaching could eliminate or reduce tooth sensitivity. After institutional review board approval and informed consent, 45 subjects were selected and divided into 3 groups according to the dentifrice selected: Colgate Total (CT), Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief (CS) or Sensodyne ProNamel (SP). The subjects used toothpaste and a toothbrush provided to them for 15 days prior to bleaching. They were then submitted to two in-office bleaching sessions (Whiteness HP Blue Calcium). Their tooth sensitivity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for a week after each session. Their tooth shade alteration was measured with a Vitapan Classical shade guide to determine if the dentifrices could influence the effectiveness of the bleaching agent. The data were submitted to Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). The use of desensitizing dentifrices did not affect the bleaching efficacy. In regard to tooth sensitivity, there was a statistically significant difference between the results of the Control Group and Group T2 after the first session (p = 0.048). There was no statistically significant difference in the results for the other groups after the first session. In regard to the second session, there was no statistically significant difference in the results for all the groups. The use of a desensitizing dentifrice containing nitrate potassium reduced tooth sensitivity during the bleaching regimen. Dentifrices containing arginine and calcium carbonate did not reduce tooth sensitivity. Color change was not influenced by the dentifrices used.

Tratamiento de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria post terapia periodontal, mediante el uso de dos dentífricos desensibilizantes / Dentin hypersensitivity treatment post periodontal therapy, using two desensitizing dentifrices

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar y comparar la eficacia en la reducción de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria posterior a la terapia periodontal utilizando dentífricos que contienen arginina al 8 por ciento - carbonato de calcio versus acetato de estroncio al 8 por ciento, tras una y tres semanas de uso de las pastas dentales. Materiales y Método: Estudio clínico, aleatorio, ciego y controlado con dos grupos paralelos, y tres semanas de seguimiento, en el cual el universo de trabajo fue de 20 pacientes con diagnóstico de periodontitis crónica generalizada leve o moderada y que hayan presentado hipersensibilidad dentinaria posterior a la terapia periodontal no quirúrgica en al menos un canino y/o premolar, y asociado a recesión gingival. Los pacientes fueron seleccionados aleatoriamente y se distribuyeron al azar en cada grupo de pastas dentales y fueron evaluados tras una y tres semanas de uso de los dentífricos. Se les aplicó aire proveniente de la jeringa triple del equipo dental en la zona cervical con hipersensibilidad, estandarizando la técnica. La cuantificación del dolor se realizó a través de la Escala Visual Análoga (EVA). Resultados: No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre el uso de los dentífricos que contienen arginina 8 por ciento - carbonato de calcio versus acetato de estroncio al 8 por ciento para la reducción de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria tras una y tres semanas de uso de las pastas dentales. Existió diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la reducción del dolor con el uso de ambos dentríficos a la primera y tercera semana de medición.

Aim: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and to compare the efficacy in reducing the dentin hypersensitivity after periodontal therapy using dentifrices which contain 8 percent arginine, calcium carbonate versus 8 percent strontium acetate, after one and three weeks of use of the dentifrices. Methods: A three-week clinical study with 20 subjects with diagnosis of slight to moderate chronic periodontitis with dental hypersensitivity after periodontal therapy, and presence of gingival recession in canines and/or premolars. Patients were randomly selected and assigned to each group and toothpastes were evaluated after one and three weeks of use. Air from a triple syringe was applied into the cervical area with hypersensitivity. The quantification of pain was performed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: There was not statistically significant difference between the use of the dentifrices which contain 8 percent arginine, calcium carbonate versus 8 percent strontium acetate in reducing dentin hypersensitivity after one and three weeks of use of the dentifrices. Nevertheless, there was a statistically significant difference in the reduction of pain using both dentifrices in the first and third week of measurement.

Effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentin

The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of toothbrushing with desensitizing toothpastes on dentin permeability and dentinal tubule occlusion. Fifty rats provided two hundred incisor teeth divided into five groups: DW, brushed with distilled water (control); FT, brushed with fluoride toothpaste; SCT, brushed with strontium chloride toothpaste; PCT, brushed with potassium citrate toothpaste; and PNT, brushed with potassium nitrate toothpaste. Cavities were prepared to expose the dentinal tubules, and the incisor teeth were brushed using the experimental agents. After each treatment, Evans blue dye solution was applied to the teeth. Dentin permeability was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-rays (EDX). There were significant differences (p < 0.0001, ANOVA) among the groups regarding dentin permeability, number of dentinal tubules, diameter of dentinal tubules, and opened tubular area. In the SCT, PCT and PNT groups, opened and partially occluded tubules, deposits, and a few smear layers were observed. In the DW and FT groups, most of the dentinal tubules were open, with no deposits or smear layers on the dentin. EDX revealed peaks of calcium and phosphorus in all of the groups, as well as traces of strontium in the SCT group and of potassium in the PCT and PNT groups. Desensitizing toothpaste decreased dentin permeability, although it produced only partial dentin tubule occlusion.

Desensitizing treatments for dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, split-mouth clinical trial

The aim of this randomized, controlled, split-mouth, clinical study was to differentiate and clinically qualify the effectiveness of different desensitizing agents in the treatment of painful symptoms caused by cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH). Two hundred-and-fifty-two teeth of 42 patients were distributed into seven groups (n = 36): G1 - placebo; G2, G3, G4 and G6 - fluoride varnishes; G5 - sodium fluoride; G7 - potassium oxalate. Three applications were made one week apart. A three-score system (Alfa = 0, Bravo = 2, and Charlie = 3, respectively for no sensitivity, slight sensitivity and high sensitivity) was used to assess CDH after each application and after 30 days. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the Kruskall-Wallis and Dun tests. After the second week, statistically significant differences were observed for all materials compared with the baseline. After 30 days, Group G7 had presented a significant gradual reduction along all the evaluated time intervals. It was concluded that all the desensitizing agents were capable of reducing dentin hypersensitivity, with the exception of the placebo and the sodium fluoride groups.

Efecto de la arginina 8 por ciento-carbonato de calcio y del fluoruro de sodio al 5 por ciento en la reducción de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria post terapia periodontal: ensayo clínico / Effect of 8 percent arginine, calcium carbonate and 5 percent sodium fluoride on the reduction of the dentine hipersensitivity post periodontal therapy: clinical trial

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio clínico fue evaluar y comparar la eficacia en la reducción de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria de la arginina al 8 por ciento-carbonato de calcio, monofluorfosfato (1.450 ppm) en comparación con un grupo control tratado en base a un barniz de flúor (22.600 ppm) y un dentífrico fluorado (1.450 ppm), 3 veces al día durante un minuto, en pacientes con hipersensibilidad radicular en forma inmediata a la terapia periodontal mecánica (medición basal) y a las 4 semanas respectivamente. Materiales y Método: Estudio clínico aleatorizado de grupos paralelos, con 4 semanas de seguimiento, en el cual se reclutaron 20 pacientes con diagnóstico de periodontitis crónica leve a moderada, en tratamiento periodontal mecánico con presencia de recesiones gingivales a nivel de incisivos, caninos o premolares. A todos ellos, previa firma de consentimiento informado y en forma inmediata a los pulidos radiculares, se les aplicó el test térmico de chorro de aire con la jeringa de aire de la unidad dental a nivel de las recesiones gingivales con hipersensibilidad. La molestia o dolor fue determinado mediante la utilización de una escala visual análoga, realizada en forma inmediata a los pulidos radiculares (medición basal). Los pacientes fueron aleatoriamente asignados a uno de los siguientes grupos: grupo control, se les aplicó barniz de flúor (22.600 ppm) en todas las recesiones gingivales y se les indicó un dentífrico fluorado (1.450 ppm); grupo experimental, a quienes se les aplicó pasta tópica de arginina y carbonato de calcio (8 por ciento) a nivel de las recesiones gingivales, complementado con el uso de un dentífrico cuyo componente activo es la arginina al 8 por ciento-carbonato de calcio. Todos los pacientes fueron evaluados 4 semanas posterior a la aplicación y utilización domestica de los agentes des-sensibilizantes por un único examinador. Resultados: Ambos grupos experimentaron una disminución en la sensibilidad dentinaria, sin...

Aim: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and to compare the efficacy in reducing the dentine hypersensitivity of an 8 percent arginine, calcium carbonate, 1.450 ppm sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice with topical application and twice-daily brushing, with a negative control toothpaste containing calcium carbonate and 1.450 ppm fluoride as MFP, after periodontal treatment (baseline) and four weeks respectively. Methods: A four-week clinical study with 20 subjects with diagnosis of slight to moderate chronic periodontitis under mechanical periodontal treatment and presence of gingival recessions in incisors, canines or premolars, stratified based on baseline tooth sensitivity. Subjects brushed with either a 1.450 ppm fluoride dentifrice or a marketed 8 percent arginine calcium carbonate dentifrice twice daily for approximately one minute. At screening, baseline and weeks four, subjects' tooth sensitivity was determined through both evaporative (Schiff and Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]). The same examiner throughout the study performed subject assessments using each stimulus. Results: Both subject groups exhibited significant reductions from baseline to four weeks in dentine hypersensitivity. However, patients who received 8 percent arginine calcium carbonate therapy, exhibited a greater reduction, with a 60 percent of individuals lacking of pain and with a final median of 0 in comparison with the 5 percent fluoride varnish and fluoride toothpaste group in which a 100 percent of subjects felt some degree of pain, presenting a final medium VAS scale of 2.

In vitro dentin permeability after application of Gluma® desensitizer as aqueous solution or aqueous fumed silica dispersion

OBJECTIVES: To assess and to compare the effects of Gluma® Desensitizer (GDL) with an experimental glutaraldehyde and HEMA containing fumed silica dispersion (GDG) on dentin permeability using a chemiluminous tracer penetration test. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty disc-shaped dentin specimens were dissected from extracted human third molars. The dentin specimens were mounted in a split chamber device for determination of permeability under liquid pressure using a photochemical method. Ten specimens were randomly selected and allocated to the evaluation groups Gluma® Desensitizer as aqueous solution and glutaraldehyde/HEMA as fumed silica dispersion, respectively. Dentin disc permeability was determined at two pressure levels after removal of smear with EDTA, after albumin soaking, and after application of the desensitizing agents. Two desensitizer-treated and rinsed specimens of each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for surface remnants. RESULTS: Comparatively large standard deviations of the mean EDTA reference and albumin soaked samples permeability values refected the differences of the dentin substrates. The mean chemiluminescence values of specimen treated with GDL and GDG, respectively, were signifcantly reduced after topical application of the desensitizing agents on albumin-soaked dentin. The effects of GDL and GDG on permeability were not signifcantly different. Treated specimens showed no surface remnants after rinsing. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental desensitizer gel formulation reduced dentin permeability as effectively as the original Gluma® Desensitizer solution.

Dentin hypersensitivity after treatment with desensitizing agents: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two desensitizing agents in the reduction of dentin hypersensitivity in a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial. Seventy-seven teeth from 13 patients that presented some degree of sensitivity to probing and/or air stimulation were treated with one of the following desensitizing agents: Oxa-Gel (G1), Sensi Kill (G2) and placebo gel (G3 - control). According to paired t-test, all treatments, even the placebo gel, were capable of reducing sensitivity scores for both stimuli. Analysis of data by ANOVA and Tukey's test (?=0.05) showed that the sensitivity scores were significantly lower only for Sensi Kill in comparison to the other products (Oxa-Gel and placebo), when air stimulus was applied. It may be concluded that treatment with Sensi Kill presented a slightly better performance in reducing dentin hypersensitivity when compared to the other desensitizing agent.

O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a eficiência de dois agentes dessensibilizantes na redução da hipersensibilidade dentinária, em um estudo clínico aleatório do tipo boca-dividida e duplo-cego. Setenta e sete dentes de 13 pacientes que apresentavam algum grau de sensibilidade à sondagem e/ou estímulo ao ar foram tratados com um dos seguintes agentes dessensibilizantes: Oxa-Gel (G1), Sensi Kill (G2) e gel placebo (G3-controle). De acordo com o teste t pareado, todos os tratamentos, inclusive o placebo, foram capazes de reduzir os escores para ambos os estímulos. A análise dos dados pelos testes de ANOVA e de Tukey (?=0,05) demonstrou que os escores de sensibilidade foram significantemente menores somente para o Sensi-Kill em comparação aos outros produtos (Oxa-Gel e placebo) quando o estímulo ar foi aplicado. Pode-se concluir que o tratamento com Sensi-Kill apresentou um desempenho ligeiramente melhor na redução da hipersensibilidade dentinária quando comparados aos outros agentes dessensibilizantes.

A novel bioactive glass-ceramic for treating dentin hypersensitivity

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a painful response to stimulus applied to the open dentinal tubules of a vital tooth. It's a common oral condition, however, without an ideal treatment available yet. This work evaluated in vitro the effect of micron-sized particles from a novel bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate) in occluding open dentinal tubules. A dentin disc model was employed to observe comparatively, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dentinal tubule occlusion by different products and deposition of hydroxyl carbonate apatite (HCA) on dentin surface by Biosilicate, after a single application: G1 - Dentifrice with potassium nitrate and fluoride; G2 - Two-step calcium phosphate precipitation treatment; G3 - Water-free gel containing Biosilicate particles (1 percent); G4 - Biosilicate particles mixed with distilled water in a 1:10 ratio; all of them after 1, 12 and 24 hours of immersion in artificial saliva. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed to detect HCA formation on dentin discs filled with Biosilicate after 2 minutes, 30 minutes and 12 hours of immersion in artificial saliva. SEM showed a layer of HCA formed on dentin surface after 24 hours by G4. G1, G2 and G3 promoted not total occlusion of open dentinal tubules after 24 hours. FTIR showed HCA precipitation on the dentin surface induced by Biosilicate after 30 minutes. The micron-sized particles from the bioactive glass-ceramic thus were able to induce HCA deposition in open dentinal tubules in vitro. This finding suggests that Biosilicate may provide a new option for treating DH.

Comparative efficacy of two treatment modalities for dentinal hypersensitivity: A clinical trial.

Background: Dentin hypersensitivity is a recurrent condition causing discomfort and sometimes pain to the patient, which also deters him from maintaining adequate oral hygiene. Home care and office measures are used for treatment of this malady. Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of 2 treatment modalities for dentinal hypersensitivity, iontophoresis with acidulated phosphate gel (APF) gel, and dentin-bonding agent application. Materials and Methods: This split mouth randomized clinical study recruited subjects with a history of hypersensitivity with at least 2 teeth, verified by a light stroke with a dental explorer along the cervical third of the teeth. The patients were subjected to a 1-s air blast and cold water stimuli and their responses were recorded on a verbal rating scale. A total of 30 sites from 15 patients were divided into Group A-1.23% APF gel iontophoresis; and Group B-aqueous solution of hydroxyl-ethyl-methacrylate and glutaraldehyde. The teeth were evaluated immediately after the treatment and at the end of 2 weeks. In case of failure, the tooth was retreated with the same agent as before. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups at the end of 2 weeks. However, Group A was more effective clinically, with fewer number of failures compared with Group B. Conclusion: Both the agents showed a statistically significant reduction in sensitivity compared with baseline; however, APF gel iontophoresis was more effective in reducing hypersensitivity over a longer time period.